These images are taken from Kumar et al, BJUI 2017
No such quiz/survey/poll
2replies
Giovanni Cacciamani says:
The minimally invasive approach to inguino-femoral lymphadenectomy is an emerging surgical procedure and represents an option for the management of penile carcinoma (or melanoma or vulvar carcinoma), offering a less radical approach while adhering to oncologic principles (Martin 2013).
We conducted a Systematic review according to the PRISMA statement and and selected a total of 41 articles reporting perioperative outcomes following VEIL for penile, vulva cancer and melanoma. We found 32 case series (20 , 6 and 6 about VEIL in patient with penile, vulvar and melanoma cancer respectively) and 9 case report (4 , 2 and 3 about VEIL in patient with penile, vulvar and melanoma cancer respectively).
It has been reported with different names:
– Video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL) ( Tobias Machado. 2006)
– Endoscopic lymphadenectomy for penile cancer (ELPC) ( Sotelo 2007)
– Leg Endoscopic Groin Lymphadenectomy (LEG Procedure) ( Master 2009)
– Robotic-assisted video-endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy [RAVEIL],( Martin 2011)
– Robotic-assisted inguinal lymphadenectomy (RAIL) (Kharadjian, 2014)
Compared with the open approach, the VEIL showed:
– Lesser EBL,
– Cutaneous and overall morbidity are less frequent for patients undergoing the VEIL procedure
– a trend toward less lymphatic morbidity
– shorter length of hospital stay
– similar capability for lymph node removal
– similar oncological adequacy
Giovanni Cacciamani says:
Laparoscopic inguino-femoral lymphadenectomy
The minimally invasive approach to inguino-femoral lymphadenectomy is an emerging surgical procedure and represents an option for the management of penile carcinoma (or melanoma or vulvar carcinoma), offering a less radical approach while adhering to oncologic principles (Martin 2013).
We conducted a Systematic review according to the PRISMA statement and and selected a total of 41 articles reporting perioperative outcomes following VEIL for penile, vulva cancer and melanoma. We found 32 case series (20 , 6 and 6 about VEIL in patient with penile, vulvar and melanoma cancer respectively) and 9 case report (4 , 2 and 3 about VEIL in patient with penile, vulvar and melanoma cancer respectively).
It has been reported with different names:
– Video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL) ( Tobias Machado. 2006)
– Endoscopic lymphadenectomy for penile cancer (ELPC) ( Sotelo 2007)
– Leg Endoscopic Groin Lymphadenectomy (LEG Procedure) ( Master 2009)
– Robotic-assisted video-endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy [RAVEIL],( Martin 2011)
– Robotic-assisted inguinal lymphadenectomy (RAIL) (Kharadjian, 2014)
Compared with the open approach, the VEIL showed:
– Lesser EBL,
– Cutaneous and overall morbidity are less frequent for patients undergoing the VEIL procedure
– a trend toward less lymphatic morbidity
– shorter length of hospital stay
– similar capability for lymph node removal
– similar oncological adequacy
Four Seasons – Autumn’s Top Reviewer
The minimally invasive approach to inguino-femoral lymphadenectomy is an emerging surgical procedure and represents an option for the management of penile carcinoma (or melanoma or vulvar carcinoma), offering a less radical approach while adhering to oncologic principles (Martin 2013).
We conducted a Systematic review according to the PRISMA statement and and selected a total of 41 articles reporting perioperative outcomes following VEIL for penile, vulva cancer and melanoma. We found 32 case series (20 , 6 and 6 about VEIL in patient with penile, vulvar and melanoma cancer respectively) and 9 case report (4 , 2 and 3 about VEIL in patient with penile, vulvar and melanoma cancer respectively).
It has been reported with different names:
– Video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL) ( Tobias Machado. 2006)
– Endoscopic lymphadenectomy for penile cancer (ELPC) ( Sotelo 2007)
– Leg Endoscopic Groin Lymphadenectomy (LEG Procedure) ( Master 2009)
– Robotic-assisted video-endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy [RAVEIL],( Martin 2011)
– Robotic-assisted inguinal lymphadenectomy (RAIL) (Kharadjian, 2014)
Compared with the open approach, the VEIL showed:
– Lesser EBL,
– Cutaneous and overall morbidity are less frequent for patients undergoing the VEIL procedure
– a trend toward less lymphatic morbidity
– shorter length of hospital stay
– similar capability for lymph node removal
– similar oncological adequacy
Laparoscopic inguino-femoral lymphadenectomy
The minimally invasive approach to inguino-femoral lymphadenectomy is an emerging surgical procedure and represents an option for the management of penile carcinoma (or melanoma or vulvar carcinoma), offering a less radical approach while adhering to oncologic principles (Martin 2013).
We conducted a Systematic review according to the PRISMA statement and and selected a total of 41 articles reporting perioperative outcomes following VEIL for penile, vulva cancer and melanoma. We found 32 case series (20 , 6 and 6 about VEIL in patient with penile, vulvar and melanoma cancer respectively) and 9 case report (4 , 2 and 3 about VEIL in patient with penile, vulvar and melanoma cancer respectively).
It has been reported with different names:
– Video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL) ( Tobias Machado. 2006)
– Endoscopic lymphadenectomy for penile cancer (ELPC) ( Sotelo 2007)
– Leg Endoscopic Groin Lymphadenectomy (LEG Procedure) ( Master 2009)
– Robotic-assisted video-endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy [RAVEIL],( Martin 2011)
– Robotic-assisted inguinal lymphadenectomy (RAIL) (Kharadjian, 2014)
Compared with the open approach, the VEIL showed:
– Lesser EBL,
– Cutaneous and overall morbidity are less frequent for patients undergoing the VEIL procedure
– a trend toward less lymphatic morbidity
– shorter length of hospital stay
– similar capability for lymph node removal
– similar oncological adequacy